The {0} definitions in the signature and implementation are not compatible because the signature is an abstract class but the implementation is not. Consider adding the [] attribute to the implementation.
The {0} definitions in the signature and implementation are not compatible because the respective type parameter counts differ ...
The {0} definitions in the signature and implementation are not compatible because the signature declares a {1} while the ...
The {0} definitions in the signature and implementation are not compatible because the signature defines the {1} '{2}' but ...
The {0} definitions in the signature and implementation are not compatible because the signature has an abbreviation while ...
The {0} definitions in the signature and implementation are not compatible because the signature is an abstract class but ...
The {0} definitions in the signature and implementation are not compatible because the signature requires that the type supports ...
The {0} definitions in the signature and implementation are not compatible because the signature says this type may use nulls ...
The {0} definitions in the signature and implementation are not compatible because the signature says this type may use nulls ...
The {0} name '{1}' contains invalid characters. The name cannot: - contain any of the following characters: / ? : \ " < > ...